Having just finished three straight days of student conferences (and having an hour before my three-hour evening class), I find myself ruminating on rights and responsibilities. Specifically, students' rights and responsibilities and professors' rights and responsibilities. What might those be?
To wit, when faced with a student who has written nothing for the extensive major project due two days from now and whose response, when asked why he would set himself up to do poorly on the assignment, involves some shrugging and a meek, "I don't know," I had what Jon Stewart might call a moment of zen. In this moment, I felt both revulsion and relief, disappointment and acceptance, confusion and clarity.
This paradox presents itself every semester when a few (not many, thank goodness) students sit across from me in my office and unabashedly (and sometimes apologetically) acknowledge their procrastination and the potential negative effect it will likely have on their performance in my class, as though they have no control over this behavior. They sometimes even make frank and unapologetic admissions, as my student this afternoon did when I asked if he procrastinates and ignores work in other classes, that no, in fact, he does all his work in all of his other classes. And when I further asked why he thought not doing the work in my class was a good idea, all I got in return was the look of wide-eyed disbelief at being called out.
Now that I have a moment to look back upon these three days that are designed to help students further their progress on their stories (after all, these conferences don't help ME) and perhaps clarify any points of confusion, I can happily report that only five of 50 students didn't show for a conference and only four of the conference attendees had not done any work on the project. As my officemate would say, that's an incredible percentage. That's over half who were prepared, had specific questions, and who I was able to guide and encourage. I agree, that's wonderful. But as a teacher, I can't help but wonder what is going on with the minority - the select special nine who seem to think that writing a complex, comprehensive humor-laden story with a specific underlying meaning can be done with any degree of satisfaction and passability the night before. Perhaps the answer lies in rights and responsibilities:
Professors have a right to expect college students.
Students have a right to behave as though they are still in high school.
Professors have a right to expect students to make good decisions, prepare for meetings, do the work of the class.
Students have a right to make bad decisions, come unprepared for meetings, and to ignore the work of the class.
Notice the difference in action. All we, as professors, have a right to is to expect responsible behavior...but that doesn't mean we are going to get it. Students, on the other hand, have two clear action paths - take the route of responsibility or the path of Halo/Madden/beer/girls/boys/pizza/lame excuses/sleep.
Understandably, these freshmen are overwhelmed by a new place, new and higher expectations, new people, living away from family and their childhood comfort zones. But so many students are successful in the transition that it always makes me question why those few seem unable or unwilling to take the right route.
Because here's the clincher - students in both groups expect to succeed based on their choices, decisions, and behaviors. This fact is what puts this conundrum into the realm of the unsolvable for me; this I cannot relate to in any way, shape, or manner.
Honestly, when I made bad decisions in my youth, I knew it. But I also knew to expect sometimes dire consequences and never thought to beg for a better grade when I wrote the paper two hours before it was due. Granted, this was my high school behavior and by the time I got to college, I straightened up pretty fast because I was paying for it myself and wanted to succeed. However, my first two years as a non-traditional student found me taking classes that I really hated - math and science. These were not even close to favorites and they were hard for me. But I never ignored the work. I always at least tried. And when I met with a professor, I had questions, perhaps instinctively understanding that arriving unprepared was a massive waste of this person's time...this person who might be able to help me...or take pity on me (etc, etc) and to waste said person's time might be truly devastating to my grade (ie, negative consequences).
Professors have a responsibility to teach the approved curriculum in the fashion they deem productive.
Students have a responsibility to...and here's where it gets fuzzy.
What IS a student's responsibility in this day and age at a university? My gut reaction to this question is directly informed by MY experiences and MY work ethic, which is decidedly at odds (very often) with the current generation of college-aged students. (Again, not all...but enough to make me continually return to this puzzlement.)
Ultimately, there are lots of ways I could complete that student responsibility statement, from snarky and smart-ass to serious and philosophical. But I'm not going to complete it. How would YOU finish that statement? And before you answer, ask yourself whether you are answering through your lens of experience, or whether you think it truly applies to today's college students. I'm looking forward to the responses!
4 comments:
The best I can come up with is what you've already stated: students have the responsibility to make choices.
Like you, I've decided this is a lame answer, so I'm going to assign this question to my students for their weekend blog. I'll get back to you with their answers on Monday.
Wow - you clarify my muddled thoughts so well. How do you do that? Seriously, I have been having these same thoughts. Teaching in a very different composition environment than I have been accustomed to has forced me to reevaluate my expectations. I certainly have students who are significantly less prepared to do college level writing. I went into this semester knowing I would have to lower my expectations (and page requirements). While the poor or nonexistent writing skills are definitely an issue, however, I have been pleasantly surprised to find the motivation to learn and succeed is for the most part much higher than I am accustomed to. These students are very open to being taught, working hard, and being their own advocate in the education process. For example, last week I brought in an article put out by the Board of Directors of the American Association of Colleges and Universities regarding 21st century education and learning outcomes essential to making Americans more competitive in a global market. Many students in previous classes I have taught would have been oh so bored by the subject. Most of the students, these subpar writers who struggle with college level concepts, were inspired and enthusiastic. So what do I make of this microcosmic experience? The marjority of the students I have now, a mishmash traditional students who were probably near the middle or lower end of their class, adult learners trying to improve their career choices, and a sprinkling of international students, are more in line with the professor's "rights" as you outline in your most excellent post.
Hmmm....I suppose context matters, here. I agree most of all with the statement that they have the right to make choices, and I'd add that they must then take the consequences of those choices.
I can't help but be all student-advocate-y, so I'll add, too:
They have the right to teachers who present materials in a variety of learning styles; to profs who aim to help the students see why the material matters beyond the grade; to a system that treats them like people and not widgets.
I've no doubt, by the way, that your students have all of these rights met in your classes. :) Which leads me to add: a right to profs who will call them out on their crap and bad behavior.
My thoughts on this issue are very mixed.
With a lousy, disengaged professor, a strong student is often BETTER served by attending class minimally, interacting little, and teaching themselves the material while focusing their energies elsewhere. With a good professor, or an interactive course, the students who choose to disengage, not read, skip assignments, or simply not participate at all, will do poorly or perhaps slip by with a marginal grade. But, they have missed the OPPORTUNITY to learn. That's what keeps me (questionably) sane; if a student doesn't want to learn what I'm teaching, that's on him/her...as long as I have recourse to record that lack of participation accordingly.
I fear we're getting to the point where students feel they simply must abide by the old adage golf pros imparted to their caddies as to job expectations: show up, keep up, and shut up.
Post a Comment